Document Metadata Retention Policy
“After removing and managing the metadata in my document I want to automatically place it back into the DMS (Document Management System)”
This statement came from a peer and sparked a full-on metadata policy discussion within Esquire Innovations.
My question…why?
It’s really been Esquire Innovations philosophy to purposely stay away from doing that. I see two types of documents in a law firm – “organic” documents and “inorganic” documents. You want to have the organic document in your DMS, and then send out published copies of that document (inorganic) for outside consumption (based on the firm’s enterprise metadata policy).
If a firm starts putting multiple versions of a document (based solely on the metadata managed within it) on the DMS, where does that stop? You would have 10, 20, 30 clean versions of the same document there. For what purpose? Wouldn’t there be concerns about outside requests for clean documents, as well as original documents, and having to answer questions about why there is metadata in this version, and not in that version, and how about these other 20 versions?
Just something to think about.
A law firm needs a firm-wide metadata policy and the software you choose should enforce it. iScrub certainly can.
Here’s a great white paper from Judye Carter Reynolds that talks-just-about this very thing – Managing Your Metadata